top of page
Search

President Trump’s Shifting Stance on Vaping: What It Means for the Industry

clarkespositolaw

Updated: 7 days ago

From advocating a ban on flavored e-cigarettes to pledging to "save vaping," President Trump's evolving position raises questions about the future of the vape industry.
From advocating a ban on flavored e-cigarettes to pledging to "save vaping," President Trump's evolving position raises questions about the future of the vape industry.

What’s on the horizon for the vape industry now that President Donald Trump is returning to the White House?  Looking back to September 2019, in response to rising concerns about youth vaping, President Donald Trump announced plans to ban flavored e-cigarettes, excluding tobacco flavors, with the goal of curbing adolescent use. This initiative led the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prioritize enforcement against unauthorized flavored cartridge-based e-cigarettes that appeal to children, including fruit and mint flavors.

 

By November 2019, however, during a listening session on youth vaping and the “electronic cigarette epidemic”, President Trump expressed reservations about a complete ban, citing potential job losses and the impact on small businesses. While he acknowledged the public health risks, particularly for youth, he stressed the importance of finding a balance between addressing the issue of youth use and supporting the economic interests of businesses involved in the industry.

 

In September 2024, during his presidential campaign, President Trump pledged to “save vaping again!” on his social media platform, Truth Social, a clear shift from his earlier stance on the matter.

 

FDA, on the other hand, has maintained stringent oversight of the vape industry, denying over one million marketing applications for flavored e-cigarette products due to concerns about their widespread appeal to youth. In December 2024, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C., dba Triton Distribution, et al. case (Triton Case), a case challenging FDA’s denial of authorization for certain flavored e-cigarette products. During oral arguments, the Court appeared skeptical of the industry’s claims that FDA’s standards were applied inconsistently, with several justices questioning the value of directing the agency to reconsider its decision. While liberal justices emphasized the public health risks posed by flavored products, some conservative justices acknowledged concerns about procedural fairness but seemed unconvinced that the case warranted intervention. A decision on the Triton Case is expected by the end of the Court’s term in June 2025.

 

As the regulatory environment continues to evolve, businesses in the industry must stay informed and ready to adapt. President Trump’s recent statements suggest potential policy shifts that could impact the industry. However, FDA’s commitment to public health objectives, particularly concerning youth vaping, indicates that stringent regulations are likely to persist.

 

Stay informed by subscribing to our YouTube channel for ongoing updates on vape-related regulations and compliance tips: https://www.youtube.com/@clarkespositolawfirm.

 

Have questions? Give our office a call today at (917) 546-6997 or schedule an intake meeting, we would be happy to speak with you.


Ready to Learn More About CBP, OFAC,

BIS, FWS, and FDA?


We have over one hundred videos in our educational library on our YouTube channel related to importing, exporting, US Customs, BIS, OFAC, FWS, FDA, NFTs, and so much more. Subscribe to our channel now to stay up to date on the latest on these topics!


Our law firm helps growing companies who import and export comply with government regulations. We love what we do and we take our oath of confidentiality over your matters very seriously. How much? Watch this video to learn about it. CLICK HERE 


 Wondering "why should you have an attorney on your side?" Click here to watch one of our attorneys, Susan Steinman, break down the critical benefits as to why you want to have one on your side - whether you hire us to help you or another law firm.


Have questions? We are determined to help you.

We listen carefully to clients to ensure our understanding of the legal issues at hand, their factual context, and any limitations that might impact a chosen strategy. Feel free to connect with us using the contact form at the bottom of the Home page or send us an email at contact@clarkespositolaw.com.  

Comments


How can we be of help?

New York Office:

211 E. 43rd Street, 7th Floor

New York, NY 10017

Connecticut Office:

9 Mott Ave., Suite 210

Norwalk,  CT 06850

917.546.6997

Stay Connected. Subscribe.

Thanks for subscribing!

  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Per The NY State Attorney Ethics Rules, See The Following Statement:

 

Attorney Advertising Disclaimer: The content of this website has been prepared by the Clark-Esposito Law Firm, P.C. for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. The material posted on this website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship, and readers should not act upon it without seeking professional legal counsel. The Clark-Esposito Law Firm, P.C., did not produce and is not responsible for the content of off-site legal resources. The materials on this site may constitute advertising under various state ethics rules.

NYC, NYS, & PANYNJ M/WBE Certified Minority/Women Owned and Led Business

© 2025 by Clark-Esposito Law Firm, P.C.

bottom of page